Once
upon a time, Eric "Dufoxy" Dufault, Ryan “The Disembowler” Dowler and Jen Silverman were
sitting over a manly feast of beers and wings. As Youngbloods do when presented
with time on their hands, they set about discussing world politics. Then they
moved on to a careful dissection of the place of religion in a modern world. Then—and
only then— did they inadvertently stumble across a subject that was TRULY
CONTROVERSIAL.
They
lowered their voices to whispers. They shot glances over their shoulders. They
tried to conduct the conversation in pig-Latin, to throw eavesdroppers off the
scent, but ‘twas too late. The Most Controversial Conversational Topic of
Modern Times had been unleashed and there was no going back. They had entered
the topic of NAKED MOLE RATS.
“The
most adorable and mysterious creatures on earth!” Silverman declared.
“More
disgusting than a bucket of penises,” Dufoxy countered.
“My
dad discovered a new form of mouse one time,” Dowler extemporized.
And
they were off.
JEN: Whoa whoa whoa, Dufoxy. Hold your horses. Reign in your seething venom.
Here is the case for naked mole rats. First of all, they are cute. There is
nothing cuter than a semi-transparent sack of skin through which you can almost
see internal organs shifting around. Additionally, I invite you to gaze upon
their protruding front teeth. Their delicate little paws. The wonder in their
blind little eyes. Does none of this move your stony heart?
ERIC: Nope.
Look, I find naked mole rats as interesting as the
next person. But damn if those things are not ugly. Come on, Jen. We need more
honesty and genuineness in the world. And the honest, genuine truth is that an
elderly man would have a very hard time distinguishing a naked mole rat from
his penis.
Now, I’d like this to be a family friendly
environment. But look at this. Look at this terror. It looks like a penis being
devoured by smaller penises.
Let’s do a Rorschach thing here, Jen. What do you see when you look at that photo?
JEN: I see a visual representation of unfounded fear, Dufoxy. I see a living
metaphor for the misunderstood, the societal Other, the monsterization of that
which is different. I see an awesome thesis topic for a fully-funded PhD that
could rescue me from the streets and give me health insurance once again!
Now,
I don’t want to challenge the values upon which the American nuclear family is
based, but “semi-transparent
sack of skin” is an apt description of babies as well. And generally, one
thinks babies are cute and one tries VERY HARD not to mention the words “baby” and “penis” in the
same sentence. So let’s try giving NMR the same consideration. Just for a
second. And consider other instances of how miraculous they are.
For example, according to the Smithsonian blog:
1. NMRs are neither moles nor rats. They are more
closely related to porcupines and guinea pigs. (WHO DOESN’T LOVE A PORCUPINE??
– Dufoxy, do not start with me.)
2. They are
one of only two mammal species that are eusocial. (Hive-minded, like bees and
wasps. BEES MAKE HONEY, WHO DOESN’T LOVE HONEY?)
3. The queen
isn’t born a queen. She’s a female who has fought her way to the top. (WHO DOESN’T LOVE
FEMINISM??)
And finally: No one has ever found cancer in naked mole rats; they appear to be resistant to the disease. (Like green tea, dark chocolate, and coffee: who doesn’t love anti-oxidants??)
BAM. I heart you, little porcu-wasps.
ERIC: Okay.
Okay. Okay.
Clearly, there’s some weird, interesting shit going
down with these freaks. They can’t get cancer (though I wish they could).
They’re the only cold blooded mammal (which means that they're supposed to be,
like, lizards or something?). They’re called the “sand puppy” (which is an
insult to both puppies and sand). But we’re not interested in interesting, Jen.
This, like everything else in life, all comes down to cuteness.
What is cuteness? I don’t know. Do you know who does
know? Wikipedia. Which is why they have diagrams like this to help us with this
debate:
Babies are biologically cute so that their
mothers/fathers won’t eat them. And what makes them cute? A) A large head/body
ratio and B) a large eye to head ratio. So the cutest creature would be an
animal that’s all head and eyes. Now how about naked mole rats? A) Do those things have
large heads compared to their bodies? And B) Do they have large eyes compared
to their heads?
QED.
In closing, I would like to share this image of a
naked mole rat’s penis:
RYAN DOWLER: My father journeyed over volcanoes in the Galapagos
Islands to rediscover a rodent thought to be extinct for a hundred years.
I can’t even write a decent Sloan grant.
I can’t even write a decent Sloan grant.
....And
with that, ladies and gentlemen, the case is closed.
3 comments:
I side with Silverman! They are CUTE!!!! Also they move backwards. Also they have them in a museum in Seattle. I <3 them sooooooo much!!!!
Thanks Clare. If we were on a sinking ship and I had one extra life jacket and everybody was screaming my name, I would throw you the life jacket. Because, on this crucial matter, you had my back.
NMR are the superior eusocial, hairless, porcupine-related mammals.
Post a Comment